Technology adoption – MetaFacts TUP Client Portal

October 23, 2024November 6, 2024

Profile of Copilot+ PC early adopters – their AI attitudes, use cases, activity trends, and profile

Background:
Many major PC makers have recently launched AI Copilot+ PCs, enabling consumers and employees to make the most of many AI tools. The earliest brands include HP, Acer, ASUS, Lenovo, Microsoft, Dell, and Samsung, including Qualcomm technology. With so much promotional hype and confusion around AI, getting a reality check from users is essential.

Are early adopters of Copilot+ PCs very different from users of non-Copilot+ Windows 11 PCs? Windows 10 PCs? Apple Macs? The general online public?

Who are these newest buyers?

Which types of use cases are the early adopters getting AI assistance with?

How are their attitudes about AI different from the rest of the online world? Are they more positive, or are they more negative?

What are their concerns? Privacy? Wrong answers? Are they underwhelmed? And how strongly are they concerned?

What do they enjoy about using AI assistance? Creativity? Productivity? Learning new things?

Why did they buy a Copilot+ PC?

Approach:
This research is based on a survey of 11,852 online adults in the US, Germany, UK, and Japan, drawn and weighted to be representative of the online population. From this dataset, MetaFacts screened and profiled 3,131 respondents who use AI assistance with their regular activities. These use cases most used with Copilot+ PCs include personal creativity, professional creative software for work purposes, creating videos for work purposes, writing, and using professional creative software for personal purposes. Furthermore, the study details more than 80 activities, the share that are regularly done, and the percentage that are done using AI tools.

This content is for subscribers only.
Join Now

Already a member? Log in here

Usage guidelines: This document may be freely shared within and outside your organization in its entirety and unaltered. It may not be used with a generative AI system without separate licensing and express written permission. To share or quote excerpts, please contact MetaFacts.

October 10, 2024November 1, 2024

Sustained interest in smartwatches, although generations differ

Background:

Wearables have extended the literal attachment many consumers maintain to their respective ecosystems. Smartwatches are more than a fashion accessory; they can act as a visible sign of one’s brand choice, much like white headphones or blue text messages. Watching the forward interest in watches is one key indicator of Apple’s future and that of its rivals.

Approach:

This MetaFAQs is based on the responses of 54,619 respondents over four years from the MetaFacts TUP/Technology User Profile 2021 through 2024 waves, spanning the US, Germany, the UK, Japan, and China. It reports the percentage of online adults planning to purchase wearables in the next twelve months, specifically an Apple Watch, an Android Smartwatch, some other smartwatch, or a fitness tracker. This is further split by generations for global and US views. These results are drawn from the standard published TUP tables named 810 PLANSxAGEGEN.

This content is for subscribers only.
Join Now

Already a member? Log in here

October 9, 2024November 1, 2024

An Apple or Android future – the generations speak

Background:

As the smartphone market approaches saturation and ubiquity, the competition between ecosystems has become the most closely scrutinized. Will future smartphone consumers choose an Apple iPhone or an Android smartphone? Is Gen X more interested in iPhones, or are they going with Android?

Approach:

This MetaFAQs is based on the responses of 54,619 respondents over four years from the MetaFacts TUP/Technology User Profile 2021 through 2024 waves, spanning the US, Germany, the UK, Japan, and China. It reports on the percentage of online adults in three mutually exclusive groups: Those who are planning to purchase an iPhone and not an Android smartphone, those planning to purchase an Android and not an iPhone, and those on the fence – planning to buy either. This is further split by generations for and with a global and US view. These results are drawn from the standard published TUP tables named 810 PLANSxAGEGEN.

This content is for subscribers only.
Join Now

Already a member? Log in here

September 24, 2024November 1, 2024

AI’s adoption easier path among American Apple and ASUS work computer users

AI (artificial intelligence, primarily generative AI tools) has received substantial market attention. Employees are strongly affected, mainly because many AI tools are marketed for productivity and work-related use cases. However, measuring the impact of the media and investor attention is essential to determine the level of interest, receptivity, and caution. There has been enough widespread awareness to measure employee sentiment. Furthermore, commercial computer makers have much of their future contingent upon how well their solutions are put into active use by employees and valued by their employers. Suitability of today’s AI tools aligns better with some occupations more so than others.
Approach: This TUPdate is based on the surveys of 1,404 respondents in the US in August 2024 as part of the MetaFacts TUP/Technology User Profile survey. Relevant to this TUPdate, we asked respondents to report their strong agreement to strong disagreement with a series of statements about AI on a five-point scale. The survey further gathered demographics, such as employee role.
Current TUP/Technology User Profile service subscribers can find these results on their client portal.

This content is for subscribers only.
Join Now

Already a member? Log in here

September 21, 2024November 1, 2024

Gen Z and Millennials are the least negative about AI in many countries

Background:
Any new technology undergoes an awareness and acceptance process before reaching any level of market penetration. That process often rests more on perception and attitudes than on objective measures of speeds, feeds, or productivity. The hype around all things AI has certainly addressed the awareness aspect, although the messages have brought more confusion than clarity for most consumers. Several themes have emerged around the possible benefits from AI assistance such as sparking creativity, boosting productivity, or fostering learning. Simultaneously, there are widespread concerns deterring adoption, including threats to privacy, incorrect results, and disappointment in the offering from what the user expected. Regarding which part of the market might be most accepting of AI, a widely held view is that Generation Z would be first. We’re hoping to address this presumption with empirical evidence.

Approach:
As part of the MetaFacts TUP/Technology User Profile 2024 study, we asked respondents to rate nine statements on a five-point agreement scale. For this analysis, we evaluated three statements as being positive: “AI is a very good way to learn new things,” “AI has been helping me be more productive”, and “AI has been helping me be more creative.” We measured three other statements as being negative: “I am concerned that AI may threaten my privacy,” “AI gives too many wrong answers,” and “AI is not as good as I thought it would be.” We calculated a difference score as the summation of positive ratings minus the negative ratings. We report this difference score by generation and country.

This content is for subscribers only.
Join Now

Already a member? Log in here

September 20, 2024November 1, 2024

American employees and AI-assisted use cases – an emerging yet complicated work relationship

The workforce is one of the primary target markets for generative AI. From knowledge workers to front-line workers, employees of all roles have evaluated and implemented AI for various use cases. Many employers have been the driving force behind the commercial adoption of AI as they hope for productivity gains. Many employees are early adopters and find personal applications they enjoy, shaping their experience and expectations. However, broad market adoption has continued to encounter challenges. Employees and employers alike express concerns about their privacy, disappointment in what they’ve seen so far, and apprehension about getting too many wrong answers.

Approach

This TUPdate is based on the attitudes of 3,422 online employees in the US, selected and weighted to represent the online population. As part of the TUP/Technology User Profile 2024 wave, MetaFacts included questions about employees’ attitudes and expectations of generative AI tools. The survey measured attitudes around the benefits active AI users are enjoying, hopes for the future, privacy concerns, usefulness, and hardware limits. We defined active AI use as a combination of regular activities involving AI tools, specific services like ChatGPT and Copilot, or a Copilot+ PC. Among more than 80 regular use cases across all devices – smartphones, computers, or tablets – we reviewed various work-related activities, spanning communication, collaboration, creation, productivity, and others.

This content is for subscribers only.
Join Now

Already a member? Log in here

September 17, 2024November 1, 2024

Pro and con attitudes make AI a pushmi-pullyu

Awesome and shiny new technology is not enough to gain rapid, active, or sustained market acceptance. Even widely touted technological phenoms are not guaranteed to be as widely accepted, as we’ve seen with smart homes, smart speakers, 3D printers, IoT, and others. Also, even broad initial acceptance does not translate into engaged or sustained use. Gauging consumer sentiment is one measure of generative AI’s challenges and opportunities ahead, especially by comparing the views of those with hands-on experience to those waiting or avoiding.
Approach: This TUPdate is based on the attitudes of 12,032 online adults in the US, Germany, the UK, and Japan, selected and weighted to be representative of the online population. As part of the TUP/Technology User Profile 2024 wave, MetaFacts included questions about consumers’ attitudes and expectations of generative AI tools. The survey measured attitudes around the benefits active AI users are enjoying, hopes for the future, privacy concerns, usefulness, and hardware limits. We defined active AI use as a combination of regular activities involving AI tools, specific services like ChatGPT and Copilot, or a Copilot+ PC.

This content is for subscribers only.
Join Now

Already a member? Log in here

January 25, 2024March 19, 2024

Computer refresh rates keep on, buoyed by later generations

With the onset of the pandemic and related economic shifts, computer acquisition patterns did not spike substantially. After reaching a peak of new computer use in 2021, the share of Americans and Germans using a computer acquired in the prior 12 months has subsided.

This MetaFAQs reports the percentage of online adults using a computer acquired in the prior year, split by country and age generational group. Report [TUP_doc_2024_0125_newt] in TUP Lenses: Devices; PCs; User Profile

This content is for subscribers only.
Join Now

Already a member? Log in here

January 20, 2024June 6, 2024

Home computer use is age-skewed and continuing the pre-pandemic drop

Thie MetaFAQ reports on the percentage of online adults who regularly use a home computer, split by country (US, Germany, UK, Japan, and China) and age group. Report [TUP_doc_2024_0120_pcat] in TUP Lenses: PCs; User Profile

This content is for subscribers only.
Join Now

Already a member? Log in here

January 20, 2024February 12, 2024

Home computer use is age-skewed and continuing the pre-pandemic drop

Home computers began to decline in use in 2018, a drop that accelerated with the pandemic’s onset. Younger adults across multiple countries were the first to reduce their home computer use which older adults then followed. In 2023, all age groups across the countries surveyed have reduced the share that actively uses a home computer. Usage is lowest among younger adults, although rates are also lower among older adults than in 2017.
Thie MetaFAQ reports on the percentage of online adults who regularly use a home computer, split by country (US, Germany, UK, Japan, and China) and age group. Report [TUP_doc_2024_0120_pcat] in TUP Lenses: PCs; User Profile

This content is for subscribers only.
Join Now

Already a member? Log in here